Loading...
 

NanoBlog

A blog about anything nanotech

DIY Bio

morreale Tuesday 29 of January, 2013
Some day I hope to have FETs that I need to functionalize and make into biosensors. I have no biology background so the DIYBIO website looks like a great reference to fill in the knowledge gaps.

Image

NNI Nanofab user facilities

morreale Saturday 26 of January, 2013
Nano.gov has posted a list of the NNI R&D User facilities available to anyone looking to build nanoscale devices. Many nanofabs offer equipment by the hour with no IP entanglement while a few have a IP sharing requirements to use the facilities so read the user agreements carefully.

Image

Brookhaven National Laboratories

DARPA nanotech centers

morreale Thursday 24 of January, 2013
DARPA has funded six new nano-electronics centers as reported on the Guardian Express website. The six centers include:
  • Function Accelerated nanomaterial Engineering (FAME)
  • Center for Spintronic Materials, Interfaces and Novel Architectures (C_SPIN)
  • Systems on Nanoscale Information fabriCs (SONIC)
  • Center for Low Energy Systems Technology (LEAST)
  • Center for Future Architectures Research (C-FAR)
  • TerraSwarm Research Center (TerraSwarm)
Past DARPA programs and projects have produced some disruptive technologies in the past so it will be interesting to see what these project produce.

Blue butterfly wings

morreale Thursday 24 of January, 2013
Butterfly wings are a masterpiece of nanotechnology all grown organically. Show offs! The wings are covered with nanostructures that produce the brilliant blue color. Derek Muller at Veritasium interviews Clint Landrock the Chief Technology Officer at Nanotech Securities and Clint describes how he produces similar colors by stamping 100 nm diameter holes into plastic.

Image

Carbon nanotube fibers

morreale Friday 18 of January, 2013
Researchers at Rice University have developed a wet processing system that produces carbon nanotube fibers In the video, they show a spool holding a single fiber that is 50 m long. They also support a small LED bulb with two fibers that also powers the lamp showing the strength and conductivity of the fiber.

Image

Solar powered water purification

morreale Tuesday 18 of December, 2012
Deepika Kurup, a 14-year-old high school student from Nashua, New Hampshire won a $25,000 prise from the 3M Young Scientist Challenge for her solar powered water purification system based on TiO2, ZnO nanoparticles, 3M Glass bubbles, and cement. The TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles act as a photocatalyst to produce hydroxyl radicals that kills bacteria and the bubbles are used to reduce the weight of the purifier. Cement is a common local material in developing countries.

Intel Tri-gate FET history

morreale Saturday 15 of December, 2012
Mark T. Bohr, Sr. Fellow and Director of Process Architecture & Integration describes Intel's Tri-gate transistor development: from finFET concepts to Tri-gate transistors — part 1 in this short interview. The tri-gate FET was based on the finFET that a Japanese company developed in 1989. Intel started doing development on the technology in around 2000. The Tri-gate is different in that it adds a channel on top of the fin and the gate wraps around three sides of the fin. The Fin is 8 nm wide and has a 60 nm pitch that is all fabricated using 193 nm spacer beam pattering lithography.

Image

Roll-to-Roll nanofab facilities

morreale Wednesday 12 of December, 2012
The University of Massachusetts Amherst has roll-to-roll nanomanufacturing equipment and facilities available for users. This includes
  • Roll-to-Roll Nanoimprint Lithography
  • Roll-to-Roll Coating
  • Microgravure Coating
  • Thermal Nanoimprinting
  • Step-and-flash Imprint Lithography
  • Plasma Etching
  • Mask and Bond Alignment
  • Nanoindentation
  • Softwall Clean Rooms
User fees range from $200 to $800/day depending on the equipment and the user classification. A short presentation illustrates the roll-to-roll fabrication process required to build floating gate transistors.

Image

8th annual Scott Livingston Nanotechnology Conference

morreale Wednesday 12 of December, 2012
The conference was held at the offices of Akerman Sinterfit in NYC. The conference started with an off-site tour of the Shapeways Inc. factory in Long Island City. The invitations to the conference were made four days before the conference which is shorter than usual. Scott indicated that Sandy delayed some of the preparations. This may explain the smaller that usual attendance and lower variety of companies present. There were no power point presentations so it was hard to identify all the individuals and companies. I made a best effort.

Jon Wellinghoff, Chairman of FERC
Energy oversight and regulation for utilities, nuclear power plants, and gas export licensing plus they oversee sales of energy transmission through the US expect for Texas because it has its own power network. Jon describes what he sees as three disruptive trends:

  1. Slowdown in the growth of electricity due to increased efficiency
  2. Internet of things moving to the Smart grid
  3. Distributed power generation

Distributed generation will cause utilities to change their rate structure, but the utility rate structures are a disincentive for innovation. The utility makes money by building big traditional energy projects so innovation isn’t needed to make money. In response to questions: Jon thinks it will take around 10 years for wave generators to become competitive. Germany has 2.5x more PV installed compared with the US and is at the latitude of Maine

Karen Lightman Executive Director of the MEMS Industry Group gave the presentation. Noah Himberger Program Director was also present but did not speak.

MEMS are 40 years old now, and were first developed at Westinghouse. Inkjet printer heads are and example of mature MEMS enabled devices, but MEMS are now being used for microfluidics devices for new applications. The industry generates $l0B/year. The MEMS group has 145 member companies, but for all its size there are only two market analyst and very few VCs that are active in this industry. The MEMS Industry Group has a LinkedIn group, a twitter feed @MEMSGroup, and a searchable member database. Karen had three member company representatives speak at the talk.
  • Edgar (not sure of his affiliation) talked about lnvenSense which is a $900M company that makes MEMS gyroscopes, accelerometers, and compasses. These are used as part of a MEMS navigation system. InvenSense raised $60M. Edgar indicated that having samples makes it easier to raise money.
  • Robert from microGen described their MEMS device converts vibrations to electricity also known as piezoelectric energy harvesting technology. One of their micropower generators can produce an output voltage > 10 Volts, and output power >100 uW @ 120 Hz and G > 1.0 g. Microgen has a very mixed customer base because energy generation for sensors is very diverse.
  • Sam from Sand 9 talked about MEMS resonators for wireless communications. The MEMS resonator replaces quartz crystal oscillators and can be integrated into the IC reducing the size of the system. Sand 9 has received investments from Intel Capital, Paul Allen, Ericsson, and Khosla Ventures. The company is well financed. According to Sam and it took six months before Paul Allen made his investment.
A discussion followed each person’s statements and included some of the following comments
  • According to Sam, the problems in the MEMS industries include a lack of standards and a lacks of capital. Foundries now have a MEMS process that helps new entrants. Access to government capital/funding will be limited in the future due the Republican congress.
  • Jon says that data centers are finding ways to reduce energy by reducing power & heat loads.
  • Sand 9 had Intel to help then get into reference designs for cell phones.
  • Presently, data centers use more energy than India.
  • MicroGen thinks MEMS microprojectors will be big soon

Next, Scott Livingston of Livingston Securities spoke about the opportunities for investing in nanotechnology. He envisions creating a large base of small investors that can participate in the IPO market for nanotechnology companies. Livingston Securities did 21 transactions this year and hopes to do 60 next year. Scott sees too few investment banks controlling IPO deals and would like to offer smaller scale IPO opportunities ($20M range) supported by his base of nanotechnology investors. He said the average first day pop for his IPOs was 5.8%. Scott indicated that VC investing has dried up as VCs are saving their capital for later stage investments in their portfolio companies. A $2M initial investment implies a $6M investment in the next round so the VC shares do not get diluted. Later stage round will require even larger investments. Angel investing is also slow now. Scott thinks that the Jobs Act can really help small companies raise money and help the IPO industry. He thinks that companies should raise $2M in VC money now and them raise $15M in the IPO market. He would rather eat glass than crowd funding a company due to the lack of knowledge about the investors, the $lM max raise, and the lack of regulatory requirements on the crowd funding community. Scott has regulatory requirements that protect his investors.

Frank form Nano Terra is working to commercialize the works of Harvard professor Whitesides’ patent portfolio which are biotechnology related. The company’s strategy is to partner with competitors to lower the capital requirements of commercializing their technology. The use no VC money in the process, but get funds from the founders and corporate partners. They don’t find working with VC fruitful. They have been developing technology with Boeing, Merck, and 3M.

Alan from CVAC System makes a pod that allows users to experience low pressure. This system promotes equivalent of exercise and training that is more effective than doping regiments for athletes. The system is being studied to treat and prevent type 2 diabetes. 9/11 first responders have reported to breathe better using the system. The company has 160 investors, has raised $3M ($10,000 is the minimum investment), and generated $2M in revenues from prototype sales. The systems are sold as sports equipment in the US. The WSJ has a short article about the pod.

Harry from NanoTox produces nanotoxicology reports for Fortune 100 companies. The company helps clients identify and resolve any health and safety issues with their nanotech products. They work with European companies and advise the insurance industry as well.

Greg Adams from Green Earth Technologies makes green motor oils from a bio base made from plants and animal fat that is grown in the US. The company has raised $20M to date.

Bai Xu from Nano Med Devices showed a device that can inject compounds through the skin without damaging it. The primary application is skin care. Most cosmetics and creams are placed on the skin do not penetrate the skin so they are not as effective. His device contains microstructures that can place compounds under the skin.

Mostafa Analoui is the head of Healthcare at Livingston Securities and he spoke about healthcare and nanobiotechnology.
Healthcare: Corporations have $1.5T in cash on sidelines. Mostafa thinks that this money may get invested if W.DC. gets its house in order. Presently, medical companies are supporting Republicans. VCs are behaving like a mini private equity firms and have shifted toward late stage investments. Four VCs invested $220M in a healthcare company, for example. Healthcare companies return 20% per year, and the trend has been for the final IPO price to be lowered just before the offering goes public. 19 IPOs in biotech (includes medical devices) and 28 Pharmas in the past have become just 5 IPOs more recently. It costs $2.5M cost to go public and $1.5M/yr to stay public.

Nanobio: Most of the nanobio companies failed or did not do well over the last 10 years, but there is some positive activity recently. MEMS are moving faster than expected. Modify an existing diagnostic device by making it better is highly desired by investors. Microchip is adding seniors to detect Insulin without pricking your fingers, for example. What are the tax implications of the healthcare act on medical devices? The answer will determine if or how the $1.5T gets invested. We spend 17% on health care in the US. With the Affordable Care Act the healthcare industry will sell more, but will have lower margins. There is lots of waste in the US healthcare system. Alzheimer's disease drugs will be big because it is the most likely disease long lived individual can expect to get followed by cancer. Pfizer made a 100GB filing with FDA for a new drug which contains 100,000 people in the study. About 20% of people in trials cheat which causes a lot of noise in the data. New technology will keep people from cheating and make them follow the protocol. Personalized medicine is complicated and expensive (the business model not known at this point). Off-label medicine ends up in clinical trials because doctors see interesting trends in their patients. Smaller revenue with targeted revenues results in negative ROI for the industry. Precision medicine will be difficult because the cost of drug development is so high. Pfizer s thinks nanotechnology is good for Pharma and Biotech because it can deliver drugs precisely.

Wolfgang Huebschle from the Bavarian US Offices of Economic Development helps small and mid-sized companies partner and do business in Germany. Incubators are available and they can provide real estate without having to commit to a lease. Companies with market caps of $100M are in the sweet spot for his group.

Mike from the NYEDC which works on projects to develop growth for the NY City. They are presently working to develop a biotech industry for the city.

Stijn Craemer from the Netherlands Foreign Investment Agency and helps companies do business in the Netherlands.

Joan Stanescu from the Lehigh University Center for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology works to build partners with industry and government to promote education and nanoscale sciences and engineering. The center offers workshops, university resources, and the Ben Franklin fund is located near too.

Kate Dineen form Senator Gillibrand’s office was at the meeting and took suggestion that would be beneficial to the business community. One participant suggested that the senator work on initiative that help motivate young people to study STEM fields, speed up the patent process, work on immigration reform (give VISAs to entrepreneurs that invest in the state), and promote manufacturing, for example. Senator Gillibrand was just elected to a 6 year term and is on the Environment and Public works committee, the Arms Service Committee, and the Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee. She is focused on job creation and has been working on hurricane relief.

Note that my account of the meeting should not be taken as a recommendation, endorsement, or anti-endorsement of any of the companies listed. The account should be used as information only as the accuracy may not be exactly precise.